|
|
|
|
Why did BofA lose the white in red, white and blue?
Back to the homepage
|
| Views: 1233 |
Report
|
|
At first I thought it was a mistake, but surely and steadily all of the Bank of America branches have been changing their signs to an awful solid red. It assaults my eyes. It clashes horribly with an otherwise nice logo. It makes me uneasy and is simply a bad omen. Does nobody else see this?
About this poster:
Designer, artist and fellow citizen
Posted by:
walkerfx
(male, mid-30s)
(Posted 10/10/08)
|
|
Resource Links:
Free (relevant links only)
|
|
Responses (1)
|
Anonymous
(3/2):
The new colors may be a sign that it is more of an international bank now. All countries contribute to others in one way or another.
(report)
|
|
|
Responses (4)
|
leleles
(1/9):
I agree.
(report)
|
|
Anonymous
(3/11):
I agree. This looks like a mistake. How could B of As marketing team agreed on this awful choice?
(report)
|
|
Anonymous
(3/2):
I totally thought same... but what do you do? Think it looks red Chinese.
(report)
|
|
Anonymous
(3/2):
It does not look like an American bank anymore. I preferred the red with White and Blue. The "red, white and blue..." Other countries are OK of course... it's just this is America.
(report)
|
|
|
|
|
